HomeArchivesSpeakingAudio / Video The ExchangeLifeWay ResearchLifeWay Research Team
Home
Home
FacebookRSSTwitterVimeoYouTube
Click here to have Ed's RSS feed on your site
Topics
  • Articles
  • Bible
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Church
  • Church Planting
  • Church Revitalization
  • Culture
  • Humor
  • International Missions
  • Interviews
  • Leaders
  • Lifeway
  • Megachurch
  • Ministry
  • Missional
  • Multisite
  • Personal
  • Politics
  • Preaching
  • Presentations
  • Research
  • SBC
  • Seminars
  • Social Media
  • Teaching
  • Theology
  • Video
  • Web
Series
  • Guide to the Blog
  • The Meanings of Missional (5 Parts)
  • Multi-site Churches
  • Young Adult Dropouts
  • Calvinism and the SBC
Leadership Interview
  • Thom and Sam Rainer: Essential Church
  • Brad Waggoner: The Shape Of Faith To Come
  • Jared Wilson: Your Jesus is Too Safe
  • Tullian Tchividjian: Unfashionable
  • Skye Jethani: The Divine Commodity
  • Mark Liederbach & Alvin L. Reid: The Convergent Church
  • Scott McConnell: Multi-Site Churches w/ Scott McConnell
  • Steve Ogne & Tim Roeh: TransforMissional Coaching
  • Alan Hirsch & Michael Frost: ReJesus
  • Kary Oberbrunner: The Fine Line
  • Steve Addison: Movements That Change The World
  • John Avant: If God Were Real
  • Geoff Surratt: Ten Stupid Things That Keep Churches from Growing
Most Popular Posts
  • Thinking on the Plane
  • Reflecting on Balance and Rest in the Ministry
  • My Interview with Adrian Warnock: Why We Need Non-Paid Christian Leaders
  • Thursday is for Thinkers: Wendy Horger Alsup on Equipping Women for Gospel-Centered Lives
  • No Such Thing as "the Gift of Evangelism"
  • Comment Policy
  • Church Leadership Book Interview: Charles Stone on 5 Ministry Killers and How to Defeat Them
  • Transformational Church
  • Viral Churches Interview
  • Christians are Hate-Filled Hypocrites . . . and Other Lies You've Been Told
Alltop - Best of the Best
 

Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists

Monday March 24, 2008   ~   8 Comments

Today I am in Bowling Green, KY teaching at First Baptist Church, Bowling Green for the Kentucky Baptist Convention.
comebackseminar.jpg

Here is a photo of the conference from inside the sanctuary of First Baptist. There were about 350 people at the conference and the KBC announced that they are creating a process around our book, Comeback Churches. You can download the PowerPoint here.

IMG_9687.jpg


---------------------------------------------

Now, you keen students of history know that First Baptist is an important part of the history of the Southern Baptist Convention.

And, since I like to give a "little extra" on the blog...

First Baptist was a key part of what is knows as the Landmark Baptist movement.

Wikipedia explains Landmarkism:

Most theologians and historians who have dealt with Landmarkism have agreed that the following ecclesiological convictions were inherent to the system:

The exclusive validity of Baptist churches

Although different champions of the Landmark Baptist cause have identified different required characteristics, or "marks," that validate a legitimate Baptist church, all varieties of Landmarkism stipulate that legitimate Baptist churches are the only legitimate churches. According to Landmarkism, congregations of other denominational varieties are merely religious gatherings, or "societies," with no claim to the title "church."

The invalidity of non-Baptist churchly acts

Landmark Baptists have refused to recognize as valid any baptisms or ordinations performed in circumstances other than under the auspices of a Baptist church. Thus, Landmark Baptists have declined to allow non-Baptists to preach in Landmark Baptist churches and have required prospective members who have received "pedobaptism" or "alien immersion" to be baptized by a Baptist church before receiving them into membership. Expressed as a syllogism, the Landmark Baptist argument is:

Major premise: To be valid, Christian ordinations and baptisms must be performed by a valid New Testament church.

Minor premise: Only valid Baptist churches are valid New Testament churches.

Conclusion: Therefore, only ordinations and baptisms performed by valid Baptist churches are valid Christian ordinations and baptisms.

The leaders of the Landmark movement were at times called "The Great Triumvirate," made up of J.R. Graves, James Madison Pendleton, and Amos Cooper Dayton.

James Pendleton was the pastor of First Baptist in Bowling Green. His work, Old Landmark Reset, is a foundational document for Southern Baptist Landmarkism. You can download the entire book here, and be sure to note the subtitle: "Ought Baptists to Invite Pedobaptists to Preach in Their Pulpits?"

However, Pendleton did not hold the same views as some other Landmarkers, particularly on "Baptist successionism."

Baptist Successionism

Some Landmark Baptists (not all) believed that the true church could be traced back all the way to John the Baptist. They wanted a view of "succession" that focused on baptism (hence Baptist Successionism). Some saw this as a response to the view of Apostolic Succession, or the belief that Peter ordained (Pope) Linus ordained (Pope) Anacletus... eventually ordained the current pope. I tend to think it had more to do with the Stone Campbell movement's "restoration" views-- Baptists wanted to show they had nothing to "restore." They were always here.

Landmark Baptists believed that the early Christians baptized each other properly. But, they believed, error soon crept in on issues such as baptism. But, some believed there was always a remnant, a "trail of blood." So, the Montanists baptized the Donatists, who baptized the Paulicians... eventually baptizing Southern Baptists.

You can click here to download the chart with all the details. (As a young pastor, I once preached at a rural North Carolina church with this very chart painted on the wall.)

James Milton Carroll, decades later, wrote The Trail of Blood, telling the full story from the Landmark Baptist successionism perspective. You can download the whole book/pamphlet here. Over 2 million copies were published and its influence on the denomination was profound.

Some people mistakenly equate successionism with Landmark ecclesiology although, as with Pendleton, one can be the latter without being the former.


So What is Landmark Baptist Ecclesiology?

Theopedia explains in more detail:

The impetus for the movement was the publication of Pendleton's An Old Landmark Reset in 1854, and the Cotton Grove meeting of Baptists in 1851. The meeting at the Cotton Grove Baptist Church near Jackson, Tennessee sought to answer five questions:
"(1.) Can Baptists with their principles on the Scriptures, consistently recognize those societies not organized according to the Jerusalem church, but possessing different government, different officers, a different class of members, different ordinances, doctrines and practices as churches of Christ?

(2.) Ought they to be called gospel churches or churches in a religious sense?

(3.) Can we consistently recognize the ministers of such irregular and unscriptural bodies as gospel ministers?

(4.) Is it not virtually recognizing them as official ministers to invite them into our pulpits or by any other act that would or could be construed as such recognition?

(5.) Can we consistently address as brethren those professing Christianity who not only have not the doctrine of Christ and walk not according to his commandments but are arrayed in direct and bitter opposition to them?"

The emphasis of Landmarkism is:


-that the church is local and visible only;

-that the church has had a continuous existence since its organization by Jesus before Pentecost until the present day (sometimes called Baptist successionism or church perpetuity);

-that the Great Commission was given to the church (local churches) only; and

-that baptism and the Lord's supper are church ordinances and are only valid when performed by authority of a New Testament (Baptist) church.

baptistry.JPGSo, today I spent that day at a church that was part of a movement... interesting indeed.

Although I am not teaching history today, I thought you might find it interesting!

Here is a picture of the baptistry. It is big-- very big. I am guessing 8 people could fit in there. There is a dome over it and it is the most distinct feature in the sanctuary (which, makes sense, considering the info above).

Posted on March 24, 2008 at 7:10 PM   ~   8 Comments

Tagged with: comeback churches, conference, denomination, history

Subscribe via RSS or Follow us on Twitter
Follow us via RSS Follow us On Twitter

Share This Post
Facebook
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Digg
TwitThis
Mixx
Technorati
NewsVine
Reddit
Google
LinkedIn
co.mments
YahooMyWeb

8 Comments

By Les Puryear on March 25, 2008 3:10 PM

Ed,

Does FBC Bowling Green still claim to be Landmark?

Les

By Ed Stetzer on March 25, 2008 6:29 PM

I didn't ask, but I am pretty sure they do not.

Ed

By Michael on March 26, 2008 7:13 AM

If you in Bowling Green, say hello to a friend of my company, Steve Ayers. Great guy. Passionate and focused. I love him.

By Camel Rider on March 26, 2008 7:34 AM

Great post. I've never really understood the whole landmark thing. Thanks for the great explanation. So how did the landmark view make its way into IMB guidelines? I speak of the fact that a person can not be appointed to the board if they were baptized in a non-sbc church, even if it was a legit post-conversion baptism.

By Jeff Voorhees on March 26, 2008 5:22 PM

Ed, now I understand why you told me that I am the pastor of an organization that is not properly considered a church. You ARE a Landmarker!

But then again, my own denomination's Belgic Confession says that a true church properly administers the two sacraments properly. Since you don't baptize the children of believers, you don't belong to a true church either! LOL! So there! Does that make me a Beglian or just a Dutch stifkop? Haha!

BTW--I am now the Pastor-elect of Drenthe Christian Reformed Church. God is good!

By Ed Stetzer on March 26, 2008 9:35 PM

Camel Rider,

As a denominational employee, it would not be appropriate for me to comment on the actions of another agency.

Jeff,

Indeed, you have figured me out. But, I would not really be a landmarker... just someone who thinks beiever's baptism is biblical.

Ed

By Malcolm on April 14, 2008 8:46 AM

Thanks for this piece.

I have been trying to network with a small Landmark Baptist church here in WV... and the pastor has not given me the time of day. Then I was at a funeral that we both assisted with... the mother of the deceased goes to church... she introduced me to her pastor, the one from the Landmark Baptist church.

She told him that he needed to have me over to preach. He gave me this "I don't think so" look.

Now I know why.

Thanks.

By Rev. Brandon Rich on January 8, 2010 11:37 PM

I was raised and baptised into First Baptist Church of Bowling Green, along with several generations of my family on my mother's side. No, FBCBG does not still hold to Landmark theology. Also, the baptistry is designed in the way that it is because of the fire in 1991 that destroyed the long-time sanctuary. That building had a design modeled after the Roman Pantheon with a domed ceiling. The design and placement of the baptistry in the 1994 sanctuary was to be a reminder of the dome in the former building. It was placed close to the front so to allow family members of the baptismal candidates to be closer than is normal.

Comment Policy

Comments are welcome on discussion posts.  Comments are not moderated but do require a keyword to avoid spam.  If this is your first time commenting, please review the comment policy.

Leave a comment

» Subscribe to these comments.
 
Recent Comments
  • Rev. Brandon Rich commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
  • Malcolm commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
  • Ed Stetzer commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
  • Jeff Voorhees commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
  • Camel Rider commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
  • Michael commented on Bowling Green, Comeback Churches, and the Landmark Baptists.
Twitter Feed
    My Books
    Compelled by Love Comeback Churches   Breaking the missional Code
    Planting Missional Churches 11 Innocations in the Local Church   Spiritual Warfare and Missions
    Mission Shift Lost and Found   Viral Churches
    Small Group Resources

    Install Flash

    Get Adobe Flash player

    Schools Where I Teach
    Compelled by Love
    Ministry Partnerships
    Christianity Today Outreach magazine
    Catalyst Monthly Facts and Trends
    Christian Post
    imb connecting Baptist Center
    LifeWay: Research - Biblical Solutions for Life
    LifeWay: Biblical Solutions for Life
    Noteworthy Items
    Noteworthy Items
    • Thabiti for the Gospel
    • Theology and Worship with Mike Cosper
    • What Berger said
    • Ed Stetzer on How Leaders Are Vital to Church Transformation
    • Innovative or Innovation Dysfunctional
    • Star Wars on the Subway
    • TOAM10 Audio now available
    • One Key to Social Media Success