|
Thursday February 19, 2009 ~ 4 Comments
Donna and I are in North Georgia today. We are here for a few reasons. First, we are taking a little time off today. Then, I have some meetings at the North American Mission Board tomorrow. Finally, we are staying over for a conference on Monday called ChurchPlanters.Com. (It's a great conference so check out the web page if you are in the area-- more about that on Saturday.) My meetings at NAMB revolve around some recent research. For example, we are having an excellent continuing conversation here at the blog about some of Barna's new research on spiritual gifts. It points to a broad knowledge about the subject among evangelicals, but also some areas of confusion. You may are aware that "the North American Mission Board is collaborating with LifeWay Research on two research projects. One is researching the most effective methods for sharing Christ with the people of North America, and the other is one of the largest studies ever conducted on ministry among first-generation immigrant groups. Here's what's happening with the former project. We surveyed 15,000 Americans concerning how they were most likely to encounter and receive spiritually related messages. Is it direct mail, television, radio, websites, e-mail, periodicals, billboards, door-to-door, through personal relationships, or something else? This kind of research doesn't determine what message we share, but how we can best communicate "the faith that was delivered to the saints once for all." The latter project, focusing on first-generation immigrants, is some desperately needed research, and the first of its kind. The need for this study "stems from the fact that between 1970 and 2005, the foreign-born population in the United States doubled from about 5 percent to more than 12 percent. By 2050, half the U.S. population is expected to be of a different race than non-Hispanic white." Why does this matter? Well, the NAMB leadership explained it this way: "Out of all the people groups in North America -- and there are 587 based on ethnicity and language -- we need to decide which groups to address first," said Van Kicklighter, senior church planting strategist for NAMB in Alpharetta, Ga. "Who are the most receptive? Which groups are most readily engaged in the Gospel or spiritual things?"
I believe in research because it can aid us in developing strategies and determining emphases that allow us to preach and teach with precision. So, I'm grateful for what the North American Mission board is doing as they seek to plant biblically faithful, culturally relevant, counter-cultural churches for the glory of God. 4 CommentsLeave a comment |
























I became an Ed-ite in 2007 when you spoke at the Missional Ministry conference here in Oklahoma. Ever since I've devoured books like Comeback Churches, Planting Missional Churches, and various whitepapers/blog posts with this valuable research.
My disconnect, that I think I share with most pastors of traditional churches, is in the implementation stage.
The data is before us, the trumpet has sounded, the warning signs are clear - the handwriting's on the wall (can I stop now?) - but the implementation is lacking.
Peter F. Drucker wrote on this idea, "This belief that you'll win if only you keep on trying out bright ideas is, however, no more rational than the popular fallacy that to win the jackpot at Las Vegas one only has to keep on pulling the lever. Alas, the machine is rigged to have the house win 70 percent of the time. The more often you pull, the more often you lose." (Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1993, p.131)
If running to the next big idea isn't going to produce results, the point Drucker makes is that we need a way to filter the good ideas from the great and only attempt those that have the best chance of success.
Perhaps I'm a pragmatist to a fault. But my question is: How can we take this valuable research and turn it into valuable results?
Great stuff. Any chance I could get a look at the criteria to determine US people groups and the list?
I look forward to reading the results and appropriating them for our missional strategies. Thanks so much, Ed, NAMB and Lifeway!
Clark,
That is the key question. In most cases, that is dependent on those who commission research since we do it for them. But, most research points to conclusions. They only questions is: will we take the needed steps.
Jonathan,
Not yet. The challenge with some of the groups is security, etc. But, NAMB will release all we can over the next few months.
Ed: Don't know whether we ever met or not, but I was the guy who worked with Larry Rose at the former HMB in Mega Focus Cities, which we all know was truly a "success". My DMin came from Southern and was on ministry in the urban places. Then I developed a church planting process called "Operation Lydia" which was and is successful around the globe and is still in use. I had the privilege of being a member of Tom Wolf's church "The Church on Brady" before he went to the faculty at Golden Gate, then to Thailand, etc. Then came the retirements, etc. Now I am 66, and way too young to be retired. I have also been individually trained by Lyle Schaller. Lately the Lord seems to have been saying I ought to at least give you a call to see whether you might have an interest in hooking me in somewhere in what you are all about. 505-366-7182. I sure would like to get back at "my life's work" as Charles Chaney called it.
Could you take some time and call me? I live 28 miles east of ABQ, NM.