I recently had the opportunity to engage the public concerning exclusive truth claims at USA Today. Is there Only One Way? was the topic - one that I obviously am passionate about, and one that many who attend church appear to be confused about. You can read the introduction here, and I am reproducing the article here on my blog. If you want to follow the conversation that followed in nearly 100 comments be sure to go directly to the USA Today site.
Is There Only One Way?
Recently, the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released a survey regarding the beliefs of Christians and their views on entrance to eternal life (http://religions.pewforum.org/reports/reports_2). The first article released by Pew included these findings:
"Most Americans agree with the statement that many religions - not just their own - can lead to eternal life. Among those who are affiliated with a religious tradition, seven-in-ten say many religions can lead to eternal life. This view is shared by a majority of adherents in nearly all religious traditions, including more than half of members of evangelical Protestant churches (57%)."
I wrote about this issue on my own blog (www.edstetzer.com) in "Are Evangelicals Really Universalists?" as a response to an earlier Pew Research project (http://blogs.lifeway.com/blog/edstetzer/2008/06/are-evangelicals-really-univer.html).
Our team at LifeWay Research (and many others) felt the definition of "religion" might lead, for instance, some Pentecostals to say that Lutherans can find eternal life through their "religion." In other words, some would hear "religion" and think "denomination." (Pew, as a professional organization, always releases the questions they ask and such analysis and questions are normal in our field.)
So I (and it appears many others) contacted the good people at the Pew Forum to share my concerns. They were gracious to listen to my concerns and subsequently re-asked the questions in a follow-up survey with a more closely worded query. In their most recent study (http://pewforum.org/docs/?DocID=380), I believe they have asked better questions and brought the issue into a sharper focus.
In their new study, Pew research states that 65% of all self-identified Christians believe eternal life can be obtained through a non-Christian belief system. Furthermore, they found that 80% of that group can "cite an example of at least one non-Christian religion that can lead to salvation."
In summary:
Pew Study 1: In the first study, Pew posed the statement, "My religion is the one true faith leading to eternal life, OR Many religions can lead to eternal life," asking respondents to agree with one or the other (or neither), to which 57% of members of evangelical churches agreed with the latter. (from the full report: http://religions.pewforum.org/pdf/report2-religious-landscape-study-full.pdf)
Pew Study 2: In the follow-up study, Pew still used the word "religions" in its survey questions, but followed-up with clarifying questions for respondents who indicated that many religions can lead to eternal life. They write, "All respondents who say 'many religions' were asked whether Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism can lead to eternal life . . . In total, therefore, each respondent had the opportunity to name up to four non-Christian faiths." They then found that 80% of self-identified Christians who agreed that many religions can lead to eternal life actually cited at least one non-Christian religion that leads to salvation.
The refinement between the two studies is helpful. With the clarifications and follow-ups added to the "many religions" language of the survey, we can be more certain that Christian respondents were not comparing apples to a different brand of apples, so to speak. By actually citing non-Christian religions that they believe can lead to salvation, Pew has done well to remove the concern that "religions" could be misconstrued by Christians as including other Christian denominations.
Theologians call people with such views universalists or pluralists.
Universalism is a term with a wide meaning, so let me define it as the belief that there are multiple means, ways, and methods to gaining an eternal reward or salvation from the divine being after death. (Some argue a difference between universalism and pluralism, but they overlap in many ways and most news stories used the term "universalism.")
Only one group from the Pew research fell into a majority view when it came to the issue that eternal life can only be obtained through faith in Jesus Christ--white evangelicals at 64%. All other groupings and evangelicals as a whole were shown to believe that actions are necessary to obtain eternal life.
The Pew article said, "The poll also finds that roughly one-third of Americans (30%) believe that whether one achieves eternal life is determined by what a person believes, with nearly as many (29%) saying eternal life depends on one's actions."
Looking at this (and other) data tells us a few things: Americans are very universalistic, self-identified Christians are mostly universalistic, evangelicals are somewhat universalistic. (Those who report evangelical beliefs are slightly universalistic and I will address that later.)
To further the discussion, let's talk about the core issues of exclusivity of beliefs and how that affects culture, religion, and human interaction.
How do you view those who hold such exclusive beliefs? Why do you think that people increasingly seem to hold universalistic and pluralistic beliefs?
Let's make it personal, as well: Many faiths believe there is only one way to God, heaven, righteousness, etc. If you are a person of faith, does your faith teach that? If so, why does it matter?
Very interesting study. And interesting clarifications. I'm most certainly pertain to exclusive beliefs regarding salvation --- it's through Jesus and Jesus ALONE. I do know many so white "evangelicals," however, that believe other religious beliefs can earn or merit salvation. What makes the difference, I wonder. What is it that puts some over the line into universalism? And what is it that keeps others safe and sound as Jesus-and-Jesus-aloner's?
Ed,
Great article. Thanks for the research. I posted a follow-up to my "tribe" and linked to your site and study conclusions. Please continue sending us such quality research (and thoughtful conclusions about that research.)
Ed,
Is "inclusivism" the same as "universalism/pluralism"? I think inclusivism is different and probably more prevalent in the Church.
My (probably incorrect) understanding:
Universalists believe everyone will eventually be saved whereas inclusivists believe that one can be saved by grace through faith but not necessarily through faith in Christ alone. According to inclusivists, not all will be saved but those who are will have some kind of faith in the true God base on whatever light they were given (hearing the gospel is not necessary).
I heard a SS teacher in my SB church promote the inclusivist position. Basically stated that some who have never heard the gospel can be saved.
The latest "Modern Reformation" magazine deals with the inclusivist position. You may want to check it out...
modernreformation.org
Ross,
I would think inclusive approaches would be common as well-- people who believe that others go to heaven even if they don't know Christ, but it is because of Christ.
Ed
Most Christians I speak with seem to believe that salvation is in Christ alone. In other words, those in faith groups outside of Christianity cannot be saved according to their teachings. However, many allow for a broad view of who can be saved under the umbrella of Christianity. Those of other denominational flavors are saved by their respective teachings. Personally, I have no doubts that there are saved people in other denominations, but anyone who is born again has been by grace through faith in Christ alone.
Thanks for the work you and your team do Ed. This post is very eye opening.