HomeArchivesSpeakingAudio / Video The ExchangeLifeWay ResearchLifeWay Research Team
Home
Home
Facebook RSS Twitter Vimeo YouTube
Click here to have Ed's RSS feed on your site
Most Popular Posts
  • Updates on Kaitlyn's Health #PrayForKaitlyn
  • President Obama, Same-Sex Marriage, and the Future of Evangelical Response
  • Recommended Books and Blogs of the Week
  • Breaking New Research: Americans Split on Whether Homosexual Behavior Is Sin
  • Brand New Research: Mother's Day Is Top Non-Religious Holiday for Church Attendance
  • Gospel-Centered Discipleship: An Interview with Jonathan Dodson, Part Two
  • Australia Reflections, part 6: Pray for Australia
  • Morning Roundup - May 14, 2012
  • Mother's Day, USAToday, and Church Attendance
  • Weekly Wrap & Church Signs of the Week: Traffic
Topics
  • Articles
  • Australia
  • Bible
  • Blog
  • Books
  • CPLF
  • Church
  • Church Planting
  • Church Revitalization
  • Church sign of the week
  • City Studies
  • Contextualization
  • Culture
  • Evangelism
  • Exchange
  • Gospel Project
  • Humor
  • International Missions
  • Interviews
  • Kick-Starting the Plateaued and Declining Church
  • Leaders
  • Lifeway
  • Meanings of Missional
  • Megachurch
  • Ministry
  • Missiology
  • Missional
  • Missional Manifesto
  • Morning Roundup
  • Multisite
  • Personal
  • Politics
  • Pornography
  • Preaching
  • Presentations
  • Research
  • SBC
  • Seminars
  • Social Media
  • Teaching
  • The Missional Reader
  • Theology
  • Thursday Is for Thinkers
  • Top Issues Church Planters Face
  • Transformational Church Spotlight
  • Transformational Small Churches
  • Video
  • Viral Churches
  • Web
  • Weekly Wrap
  • Worship
 

How to Test Your Music

Monday October 26, 2009   ~   9 Comments

help__by_ann_izzle.jpg

Oh so many moons ago, I wrote a book with Elmer Towns called Perimeters of Light. In that book, we talked about how to choose your music. In light of my comments last week about, "Ending the Worship War Without a Truce," I thought you might find this helpful.

The ideas are a bit of me and a bit of Dr. Towns. Here is the excerpt:

We must test everything by the Word of God. All of us are responsible to interpret the Bible and apply it to our life but this is where disagreement comes because we interpret differently. Music is a form that is used to convey meaning. It may be the most challenging of all forms because it involves preference, emotions, vocalization, etc.

The following seven test statements each relate to biblical principles that we should apply to our music to determine if it is Christian. Examine these seven test statements to determine if the music you prefer is Christian.

The first test is the message test. This test examines the words of the song to consider its message. Does this song express the Word of God? Does the message lift us, i.e., appeal to our higher nature, or do the words appeal to our lower nature? If we seek to glorify God, it is important that the message of the songs be consistent with the known and revealed will of God.

The second test to apply to our music is the purpose test. All music was written with a purpose in mind or heart. Determine whether the music is sad, joyful, uplifting or soothing. And again some music is designed to tempt you to sin, because it stirs your lust. Some "protest songs" of the "Hippies" were designed to get you to rebel against your government. Music that may be appropriate at one time, may not be appropriate at another time. When we apply the purpose test to our music, we choose songs that reflect our emotions or are likely to produce the emotion we wish to feel.

Third, we need to apply the association test. No music exists in a vacuum. The association test asks the question, "Does the song unnecessarily identify with things, actions, or people that are contrary to Christianity?" An otherwise good song may be rejected because of its associations with ungodly people, or worldliness, etc.

The churches that I (Ed) have pastored have generally used contemporary music. I remember coming into the worship team's rehearsal. They were rehearsing "Amazing Grace." This was not a song we sang frequently-- and they were putting it to a new tune. That was the problem. Nothing was wrong with the song. However, the tune they chose was from another song: "The Rising Sun" or "There is a House in New Orleans." Various artists have recorded it. If you know the tune, you will see that it fits nicely.

I explained to them that the association of the song would be unavoidable-- the original song would impact the meaning today. The original song was from the drug culture.

I (Ed) was reminded of this when speaking to a group of pastors, some of whom were Jamaican. I was challenging them to consider that there is no such thing as Christian music, only Christian lyrics. I asked if God could use jazz; they said yes. I asked if God could use country/western, they said yes. I asked a few others; then I asked if God could use reggae. They were shocked and clearly expressed that it was not appropriate. Reggae music was about drugs and there would be no reason to sing about drugs in church. They had a point.

I then asked if it would be OK to use reggae music in my church where we have no concept of the drug connection. They agreed. The music was not the problem, the association was. The key question for the association test is this, "What does the music bring to mind in the heart of the worshipper?" Note, not what does it inspire in my heart-- but what does it inspire in the heart of the worshipper.

For example, for me and for many others, rap music is about violence and misogyny (women hating). However, to some, it is about raging against something. Therefore, if the worshipper finds that the music helps him or her to rage against sin and the world, such a music can be associated with angst and struggle, but against something that matters. For example, one group sings:

Man is nothing, but you think that you're bad



Fool if it wasn't for my God, I would have already had you


Deny His name are you willing to admit it


And if so, are you willing to die for it


Cuz I am, He is my life and I don't fear death


Cuz he already paid the Price.


What P.O.D. has done in their song "Preach" is to take a form and to use it for a different meaning. The form of rap is no less godly that the form of 4/4 time in most of our hymns. It is a canvas waiting for a picture. It does convey and associate--angst against something. P.O.D. has followed the pattern mentioned earlier.

The fourth test is the memory test. We tend to associate our memories and experiences with significant songs in our past. This can be positive or negative. The memory test asks, "Does the music bring back things in your past that you have left?" Remember, repentance is a significant step in conversion. If you have left the darkness, don't sing those songs that make you want to return to the darkness. A song that may be enjoyed by some Christians should not be used by others who struggle with past memories.

This does not mean that we need to abuse the notion of "offending our brother." It seems that many churches have adopted a "don't-offend-anyone policy." That is not what the scripture teaches. Scripture teaches that if what we do causes people to sin, we ought not to undertake a particular practice. Listening to contemporary music does not cause the senior adult to sin though it does offend--there is a distinct difference. The association test says, "Don't use music that will lead people to sin." It does not say, "Don't use music that some will find distasteful."

The next test is the emotions test. Music stirs our emotions. Both negative and positive emotions can be stirred by music. The emotions test asks, "Does the music stir our negative or lustful feelings?" Christian music should stir our passion for godliness, prayer and righteous living. If music stirs your lust and makes you idolize or crave sin, it is wrong; no matter how innocent it may appear. This test causes us to evaluate how music affects us emotionally.

The understanding test seeks to determine the meaning of the song. Should we use music that we don't understand or have a difficult time finding the melody? Some people enjoy and understand classical music. Other people can't tolerate it or hate it. Others enjoy and understand country/western. Again, other people can't tolerate it or hate it. Applying the understanding test, those who appreciate classical music would find it easier to worship God listening to a recording of Handel's Messiah than a southern gospel quartet.

The final test may be described as the music test. This, like many of the others, is a "cultural" test that will differ from place to place. It asks, is there a "song within the song?" The music test looks at the song to determine its merits based on hymnology. It seeks to determine if the song is singable, if it flows comfortable from one line to another. Does it make your heart join in the song? A song may have Christian words and is sung by a dedicated follower of Jesus Christ, but the music is flat and leaves the audience empty. That particular song will probably pass out of existence because it fails the music test.

The history of church music suggests that every generation has its own music. Today, many older Christians reject the contemporary music of the younger believers, while the younger don't understand or use the music of past generations.

These tests lead us to one simple conclusion: God can use ANY form of music. God has no musical style or preference. Therefore, with the exception of the message and purpose test, the only tests that we have provided are cultural. The question is asked, "What impact does this music have on the culture via association, memory, emotions, understanding, and music?" These are not easy questions--but they are essential.

When a worship team is choosing music, it needs to think through some important issues. They may have the freedom to choose, but discernment calls them to choose wisely.

(Photo by Ann-Izzle)

Posted on October 26, 2009 at 5:20 AM   ~   9 Comments

Tagged with:

Subscribe via RSS or Follow us on Twitter
Follow us via RSS Follow us On Twitter

Share This Post
Facebook
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Digg
TwitThis
Mixx
Technorati
NewsVine
Reddit
Google
LinkedIn
co.mments
YahooMyWeb

9 Comments

By Steve Schenewerk on October 26, 2009 9:11 AM

As a former minister of music (now the title would be worship pastor...but I am old) another test to add- is it singable? I still lead music in our church and for our associational youth camp. Kids hear a lot of great music due to the KLOVE'ing of Christian music. But much of what is written is obviously for specific artists and is not easily performed unless the original artist is available (for our small association, it would be a huge stretch to get David Crowder et al to come and be part of our worship time...) I play guitar, bass, alto sax, etc...but if the music isn't singable by real people....

By Charles Burge on October 26, 2009 9:14 AM

Helpful and balanced - two descriptives not often associated with discussions of church music.

I'll be linking to this post.

Thanks Ed!

By Chris Ritter on October 26, 2009 9:22 AM

Ed - thank you for the insightful thoughts on choosing music. This is always a relevant issue in the church I work at, as we are currently transitioning worship leaders (for lack of a better term) and are thinking through what we want to convey to our people about God through music.

I have a slightly more personal question for you: I'm wondering how you got into writing so much. I love to write and aspire to write a book or books in the future (I'm in my mid-20's now). Maybe you could point me to a post you've already written on your past and journey in writing. Or if you haven't, I'd love to see a post on how your "writing career", if that's how you'd put it, came about. Thanks!

By Mary Courtney on October 26, 2009 11:30 PM

Hi,
I too, have been a Worship leader, music teacher (public & private) and introduced a lot of praise into the Catholic schools for kids. I played in bands on the road when I was young and after my conversion in the 70's began to reject tunes that my band would suggest-causing a lot of persecution towards me-nothing new of course. Today after years of examining this great topic-I too believe that every good and perfect gift comes from God (any style). But each day those of us who are leading the way as worshippers are called to glorify God with humility, courage and a clean heart. It is an honor to walk this road and it requires suffering and sacrifice along with wisdom and discernment. We chew the meat and spit out the bones the best we can with each new situation musically....and the closer we are to Jesus, the better we hear the voice of the Holy Spirit and are a conduit to draw people to Christ.

By David Bunker on October 28, 2009 8:58 AM

Maybe this omission is a reflection of the type of engagement and purpose of the blog but what is missing to me is glaringly revealing. Is it a good song compositionally & are the lyrics written in a creative and poetically moving manner are also considerations when dealing with aesthetics. I find that too often this aforementioned critique is offered and superimposed over the music but fails to engage the creative elements that foster a deeper metaphoric sense of truth as well as a moving musical experience. Although subjective on some levels, we need to develop an aesthetic theology that trains pastors and teachers to assess with some degree of sensitivity the process and art of song writing. Without these issues being addressed as well, our hymnody will be theologically correct & yet artistically simplistic and uncreative. God gets no glory here either.

By Hugh Poland on October 29, 2009 8:42 AM

Ed, as always, I am challenged by your thoughts. I too am a Minister of Music/Worship Pastor and I run through most of this list subconsciously while I'm choosing music. One other criteria I use is the congruency test. This probably fits under your "association" test, but for me, the music itself without lyrics can convey meaning. Example: It's hard for me to sing a song about peace with "Metallica" type music in the background. It's also hard to celebrate with reckless abandon with an organ playing whole notes on its softest stop. The style of music and the lyrics must be congruent with one another, or I think we send confusing messages.

By Glen Van Cise on November 4, 2009 6:43 AM

Great article, as always.

I understand your point on music association. Your example is a good one. But I have a question.

I have heard that some hymn writers used secular tunes (even tavern songs) and wrote Christian lyrics to match. The reason? The people were familiar with the tunes, they would connect with the tune, and learning the words was then an easy way to teach new Christians. This is attributed to both Fanny Crosby (author of some of our great hymns, like "Blessed Assurance") and William Booth, founder of the Salvation Army.

Did people like Crosby and Booth deal with these style issues when they were writing? I suppose that the difference may be that we are a hundred years or so removed from the secular songs used by Crosby and Booth, so we accept them.

Any thoughts?

By Anonymous on November 24, 2009 7:53 PM

Actually the band was not original in their tune selection. The Bind Boys of Alabama have preformed and recorded Amazing Grace to The House of the Rising Sun for quite a while. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blind_Boys_of_Alabama. It has been done by scores of other artists as well.

Here are the Blind Boys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZJ-kLKut9E

and

Here is a church doing it

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJKjNxLyqHE

The song goes back many decades before Bob Dylan or the Animals recorded it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_House_of_the_Rising_Sun

Also 1964, when The Animals recording was released was just a bit before the stereotypical hippie years.

By Dan on November 24, 2009 8:17 PM

It's interesting that you mention Messiah because the church very nearly had it banned. Handel was using the form of a sort of opera and opera was, in those days, typically a trashy sort of tale of intrigue - in no way appropriate for depicting the life of Jesus. Handel would have failed the association test in his day. Not sure what that says, just an observation.

Comment Policy

Comments are welcome on discussion posts.  Comments are not moderated but do require a keyword to avoid spam.  If this is your first time commenting, please review the comment policy.

Leave a comment


NEWER POSTS
OLDER POSTS
 
Noteworthy Items
Recent Comments
  • Dan commented on How to Test Your Music.
  • Anonymous commented on How to Test Your Music.
  • Glen Van Cise commented on How to Test Your Music.
  • Hugh Poland commented on How to Test Your Music.
  • David Bunker commented on How to Test Your Music.
  • Mary Courtney commented on How to Test Your Music.
Comment Policy
Twitter Feed
    My Books
    Subversive Kingdom Mission of God Study Bible   Compelled
    Compelled by Love Comeback Churches   Breaking the missional Code
    Planting Missional Churches 11 Innocations in the Local Church   Spiritual Warfare and Missions
    Mission Shift Lost and Found   Viral Churches
    Small Group Resources
    Sent: Living the Missional Nature of the Church - Leader Kit Subversive Kingdom: Lessons in Rebellion from the Parables of Jesus - Leader Kit   Compelled by Love: A Journey to Missional Living - Leader Kit
    Schools Where I Teach
    Compelled by Love

    Ministry Partnerships
    Christianity Today Outreach magazine
    Catalyst Monthly Facts and Trends
    Christian Post
    imb connecting Baptist Center
    LifeWay: Research - Biblical Solutions for Life
    LifeWay: Biblical Solutions for Life