|
Thursday May 27, 2010 ~ 9 Comments
Most church leaders struggle with the ongoing issue of the people in the pews being passive spectators rather than active participants. Everyone wants to have "Every member in ministry," but our lack of success is seen by our ongoing purchasing of books and continuous attending of seminars designed to cure that very plague. Before we can consider how to help the patient we need a proper diagnosis, and a proper diagnosis begins with the question: How much of the problem is my/our fault-- the very church leaders who are trying to solve it? Or, if not our fault, then the unintended side effect of our actions? Consider, for instance, the architecture of most churches. People enter and sit in rows (like shelves at Wal-Mart) all facing the same direction (the stage) where performers alternately bless us, if things are going well, or entertain us, if they are not. By default, our gathering areas tend to passivity rather than activity. As a result, what members are asked to do when they leave the gathering is the opposite of what they were asked to do an hour ago when we were together. When we leave it's "Go and change the world," but when we are gathered it's more of "Hey, sit still and listen. Welcome to Coma Land. We'll wake you when it's over." We need to engage all of the church in the activity God has for them. Our goal should be to move them from sitting in parallel rows to living in interconnected circles so that they might be engaged in the work of God wherever they go. It seems there are at least four ways that we can more effectively engage all of God's people in all of God's mission. These will be proposed and explored in this and three following posts. First, we need a better hierarchy. I realize that many people may actually have a violently negative physical reaction to my use of the world hierarchy, but the fact remains that organisms require organization in order to remain healthy as they grow. A body without a skeleton may brag about its flexibility, but others will quickly point out its uselessness. There will always be a need for organization. Even if it is an organization of house churches, those single cells need structure. Our challenge is the right kind of structure. Hierarchy sounds very "high church" coming from a "low church" evangelical like myself. But simply put, it is merely the system that a church utilizes to link the church together in its ministry and lead people to engage in God's missionary endeavor. But, in church life we typically divide Christians into three tiers, beginning with "the lay people." These are generally viewed, and often complained about, as passive spectators. They show up on Sunday, have positions and help the ministry to function, but they are not the "professional ministers." They have other jobs like plumber, politician, homemaker and candy striper. You know--real jobs. Next on the perceived ladder of church life (or calling) are those who have been "called to the ministry." These are the people paid to do the work of the ministry, i.e., Senior Pastors, Associate Pastors, Worship Leaders, and the rest of the "leadership team." They have answered the "call to the ministry," been trained, and now are the ones who do the ministry. Why not? They are the called and the trained. On the top rung are those who are "called to international missions." These are those blessed souls who have left friends and family to go into the Congolese bush and engage government rebels with the gospel of Jesus. These are the "heroes of the faith" worthy of all our respect and honor--the cream of the ministry crop, so to speak. In the minds of many, they are in another ministry world altogether. Unfortunately, for its common acceptance, this is not a biblical structure. The Apostle Peter understood the calling on the life of every believer, which is why he wrote in his first epistle, "Based on the gift they received, everyone should use it to serve others, as good managers of the varied grace of God" (4:10, HCSB). People are called to ministry at conversion, not at some subsequent event. It is the ordinary who are called to ministry, not the extraordinary. All God's people are called to the ministry, all God's people are sent on mission. The only question is "Where?" and "Among whom?" As Charles Spurgeon, speaking of such a call, said, "Every Christian is either a missionary or an imposter." Lay people tend to think of themselves as being there to support ministers in ministry, and ministers tend to think of themselves as being there to support missionaries in the field. The biblical picture is that all believers are ministers with different roles and assignments. Because of the false dichotomies, we have "lay people" who miss great opportunities to serve God in greater ways than they might otherwise imagine. Every believer should be alert to the call of God and ever vigilant to respond as Isaiah did, "Here I am, send me." In other words, God wants us to put our "yes" on the table and let Him place it on the map. Ours is not to first determine where, ours is first to lean into obedience and let God work out the ministry and logistical details. Where we serve is secondary to how we serve. This week, I had the opportunity to talk with Greg and Ruth Haslam while on the Upstream Collective Jetset Tour of London. Greg is the pastor of Westminster Chapel and we spoke about helping people live in community so they can live on mission and in ministry. Ruth said something very interesting during our conversation about the newly formed small groups at Westminster. She stated that they were "God's embassies" in the M25 (the interstate loop around London). Essentially, they are guiding people to be on mission for the King no matter where they find themselves in London. You can watch the video here: Jet Set London // Paris - Greg and Ruth Haslam from Ed Stetzer on Vimeo.
Posted on May 27, 2010 at 12:31 PM ~ 9 Comments Tagged with: Upstream Collective Jet Set 2010 9 CommentsComment PolicyComments are welcome on discussion posts. Comments are not moderated but do require a keyword to avoid spam. If this is your first time commenting, please review the comment policy. Leave a comment |





































Great post! That means we not only need to teach what scripture says, but give each member the tools to read and understand it for themselves!
Ed, may be hierarchy is the word we must jettison. Hierarchy and organization do not necessarily equal each other. Using your analogy of the body, the skin is not as important as the eyes. The body functions as designed when both of these are doing what they are supposed too. One is not above the other. Yet in Christianity we have done the opposite. We have it ingrained that some "ministries" are more important than others. We continue to use terms like lay people and clergy when Scripture holds all believers are clergy.
I totally agree with you it starts with us. Yet how far are we willing to go to make it known and the implications of it?
Good post. Look forward to part 2
Phillip
Ed,
Thanks for the insight as always. In my opinion part of the problem, is that we start off with a wrong premise in regard to a Biblical definition of what it means to be a disciple. Jesus called his followers to a complete surrender to His person (follow me) and to His mission (as the Father has sent me...) What we see in most churches is a call to surrender to the person of Christ but not necessarily to His mission. You cannot separate Christ from His mission. That is why the Gospel passages that explain "disciple" are very much in the vein of radical surrender.
I try to teach my students that "you cannot be committed to the person of Christ without being committed to the mission of Christ." In response to this problem I have created a definition of disciple:
"A disciple is a person who has trusted Christ for salvation and has surrendered completely to Him. He or she is committed to practicing the spiritual disciplines in community and developing to their full potential for Christ and His mission."
Developing to your "full potential" means that you grow in your sanctification, but you also discover and use your spiritual gift in the body and in the mission of God. Most books on spiritual formation and discipleship are only about the disciplines. Very few mention the mission.
Geographic small groups are the best place for disciples to develop and use their gifts to serve one another and begin to reach out to their neighbors with the love of Christ. It's a win/win.
Small groups also are a great place to develop leaders who multiply groups. Those leaders could potentially turn into future church planters. Movements start when God's people are developed to reach their full potential while accomplishing the mission. "The way to grow the body of Christ is to grow the individual." Eph. 4:16
Hey Ed,
I enjoyed the post. I was wondering if you were going to post the presentation that you made in Edmonton, Canada?? You told us that you were going to have it up a while ago... are you going to... I was wanting to use it. Please could ya?
thanks!
Great insights Ed. As a pastor and someone who grew up on 3 continents: Russia, Chile, Germany and Mozambique I also see that a lot of the "spectator" syndrome has to do with the "american" syndrome where have been so self sufficient historically and geographically that there is just a passion to explore other worlds. This is not bad, it's just what it is. Europeans for instance have a much more adventurous spirit simply because they can drive for a couple of hours and be in another language/culture space.
I say all of that to say this: bringing the africa, latin america, asia into the church helps a lot. through media, mission teams, guest speakers, twitter, facebook groups. We now have chance to bring the borders of those far away places straight into the church.
Ed,
You said:
"Because of the false dichotomies, we have "lay people" who miss great opportunities to serve God in greater ways than they might otherwise imagine."
As one of the "lay people", I would like to know what I'm missing out on. Could you please give some practical examples of these "opportunities to serve God" for the lay person?
Thanks,
Ross
I love this, its great, I want to get better at this. But why the 'straw man' concerning people sitting in pews (or other forms of 'arrayed' seating.). I'm called to teach, that is by no means limited to pews but sometimes that's what is called for. Or some other logical seating arrangement. Circles don't always work.
Also, I have benefited from others as I sat in a pew and learned and listened to God's word applied.
I was able to take it from the pew to the world, so can others.
I coined a term that I call INVERSE that defines apostolic global movements coming in the opposite direction from the movement of pioneer missionaries initiated centuries ago from countries like England, USA an even India.This latter gave us Donald MacGravan,who also was a writer of "The Bridges Of God and the father of the Modern Church growth movement. China can be also a place where thousands of missionaries flow to the inverse.
I coined a term that I call INVERSE that defines apostolic global movements coming in the opposite direction from the movement of pioneer missionaries initiated centuries ago from countries like England, USA an even India.This latter gave us Donald MacGravan,who also was a writer of "The Bridges Of God and the father of the Modern Church growth movement. China can be also a place where thousands of missionaries flow to the inverse.